IB Geography • Section HL6.1

Geopolitical & Economic Risks

SYLLABUS LINK

How technological and globalising processes create new geopolitical and economic risks for individuals and societies

Restored from the original AdornGeo Weebly page • syllabus order preserved

01

Hacking, Identity Theft and Surveillance

IB SYLLABUS BULLET

Hacking, identity theft and the implications of surveillance for personal freedoms.

Digital networks create enormous economic and social opportunities, but they also expose individuals and societies to fraud, cybercrime and state or corporate surveillance. The original AdornGeo sequence moves from personal identity theft to China's nationwide surveillance infrastructure and the treatment of Uyghurs in Xinjiang.

Key teaching ideas
  • Personal data have economic and political value, making identity a target for criminals, firms and governments.
  • Surveillance can support security and service delivery while weakening privacy, freedom of movement and freedom of expression.
  • Facial recognition, connected cameras and large databases allow monitoring at a scale that was previously impossible.
  • Digital risk is unequal: exposure and the capacity to protect data vary between people, businesses and states.
Key vocabulary
hackingidentity theftcybersecuritysurveillancefacial recognitionpersonal freedom
STUDENT TASK

From convenience to control

  1. Watch the identity-theft report and identify the data, actors and vulnerabilities involved.
  2. Use the four China films to construct a benefits-versus-risks table for large-scale surveillance.
  3. Read the original long-form Xinjiang article and identify how technology changes state power and individual freedom.
  4. Write a reasoned judgement: when, if ever, is mass surveillance geographically and ethically justified?
Original AdornGeo global business-risks diagram
Use the original visual to identify how digital, political, physical and economic risks connect across global networks.

Watch: UK identity theft rises by 30%

Watch: China: the world's biggest camera-surveillance network

Watch: China: facial recognition and state control

Watch: Life inside China's total-surveillance state

Watch: China's social-credit system and travel restrictions

Watch: China's social-credit score explained

02

Political, Economic and Physical Risks to Supply Chains

IB SYLLABUS BULLET

Political, economic and physical risks to global supply-chain flows.

Global production networks increase efficiency by linking specialised suppliers, assembly plants and markets. They also transmit disruption rapidly. The original case study uses Thailand's 2011 floods to show how one physical hazard interrupted automobile and computer production far beyond Thailand.

Key teaching ideas
  • Just-in-time production lowers storage costs but leaves little buffer when a supplier fails.
  • Clustering specialist firms creates economies of agglomeration and a shared exposure to local hazards.
  • Political conflict, trade restrictions, exchange rates, infrastructure failure and natural hazards can interrupt flows.
  • Resilience strategies include diversification, redundancy, inventories, nearshoring and better risk mapping.
Key vocabulary
supply chainjust-in-timebottleneckagglomerationredundancynearshoring
STUDENT TASK

Follow the 2011 Thailand flood shock

  1. Locate Thailand's flooded industrial estates and identify the industries concentrated there.
  2. Use the original presentation, visual and news reports to trace one disruption from Thai factory to global consumer.
  3. Classify the causes and consequences as physical, economic or political and distinguish direct from indirect impacts.
  4. Recommend three resilience measures, then evaluate their likely costs and trade-offs.
Original AdornGeo supply-chain risks visual
A visible summary of the hazards and vulnerabilities that can interrupt global production networks.

Watch: Thai flooding raises global computer prices

Watch: Supply-chain risk management

Original presentationSupply-chain risk presentation

Original Weebly media still to recoverTwo original Weebly supply-chain videos are no longer available from YouTube (TAYB7J9idFI and EG46utJsocI).
03

Profit Repatriation and Tax Avoidance

IB SYLLABUS BULLET

Profit repatriation and tax avoidance by TNCs and wealthy individuals.

Transnational firms can legally organise subsidiaries, intellectual property and internal payments across jurisdictions. This makes the geography of recorded profit different from the geography of production and consumption, limiting the tax base available to some states.

Key teaching ideas
  • Profit repatriation moves earnings from a foreign subsidiary back to the parent company's home country.
  • Tax avoidance is legal tax planning; tax evasion conceals or misrepresents income and is illegal.
  • Tax havens combine low taxation, secrecy and legal structures that allow profits or wealth to be booked there.
  • Avoidance creates sovereignty questions because nationally based tax systems regulate globally mobile firms and capital.
Key vocabulary
profit repatriationtax avoidancetax evasiontax haventransfer pricingbase erosion
STUDENT TASK

Map where value is created and taxed

  1. Use the tax-haven film to explain why firms and wealthy individuals shift profits or assets between jurisdictions.
  2. Examine the Starbucks example and annotate the likely flows of sales revenue, royalties, profit and tax.
  3. Use the Paradise Papers and Davos films to compare arguments made by firms, governments and civil society.
  4. Evaluate whether international coordination can protect national tax sovereignty without stopping useful investment.
Original AdornGeo Starbucks tax-avoidance animation
Trace how the geography of sales, payments, reported profit and taxation may differ.

Watch: Tax havens explained

Watch: Rutger Bregman at Davos: talk about tax

Watch: What are the Paradise Papers?

04

Disruptive Technology: Drones and 3D Printing

IB SYLLABUS BULLET

Disruptive technological innovations, such as drones and 3D printing.

A disruptive technology changes costs, locations, relationships or business models. The original page contrasts drones, which alter how information and goods move, with additive manufacturing, which may move production closer to consumers and reduce some traded flows.

Key teaching ideas
  • Drones support logistics, mapping, agriculture, disaster response, research and surveillance, while creating safety, privacy and regulatory risks.
  • Additive manufacturing builds objects layer by layer from digital files, reducing the need for some components, inventories and long supply chains.
  • Digital design files may cross borders even when finished products do not, shifting trade from material goods toward data and intellectual property.
  • Technological disruption creates winners and losers among workers, firms, transport systems and places.
Key vocabulary
disruptive innovationdroneUAVadditive manufacturing3D printingdigital trade
STUDENT TASK

Test the claim that distance is becoming less important

  1. Use the drone films to classify economic, social, environmental and political applications and risks.
  2. Interpret the original 3D-printing infographic and identify which supply-chain stages could shrink or disappear.
  3. Read the original trade article and construct one optimistic and one pessimistic 2060 scenario.
  4. Decide whether these technologies reduce global interdependence or simply create new kinds of connection.
Original AdornGeo drone animation
The original visual prompt for considering how unmanned aerial systems alter cities, business and research.
Original AdornGeo 3D-printing supply-chain infographic
Use the infographic to predict how additive manufacturing could change production, transport and trade.

Watch: Elevation: how drones will change cities

Watch: How drones could revolutionise the economy

Watch: SnotBot: drones advancing whale research

Watch: What is 3D printing and how does it work?

Watch: Will 3D printing change the world?

Watch: 3D printing and its impact on trade

05

Globalisation, Nationalism and Tribalism

IB SYLLABUS BULLET

Increased globalisation and renewed nationalism or tribalism as sources of geopolitical tension.

Globalisation connects societies but does not distribute benefits, security or cultural influence equally. Perceived loss of control, economic insecurity and identity politics can strengthen nationalism and in-group loyalty, creating new tensions within and between states.

Key teaching ideas
  • Nationalism links political identity and sovereignty to the nation; tribalism prioritises loyalty to an in-group over wider institutions or evidence.
  • Economic change, migration, cultural anxiety, disinformation and declining institutional trust can intensify polarisation.
  • Globalisation can provoke resistance when people perceive that decisions, jobs or cultural authority have moved beyond national control.
  • Political actors may amplify fear and difference to mobilise support, turning social divisions into geopolitical risk.
Key vocabulary
globalisationnationalismtribalismsovereigntypolarisationidentity politics
STUDENT TASK

Explain the geography of belonging

  1. Use the original films and reading to distinguish patriotism, nationalism and tribalism.
  2. Construct a causal chain linking globalisation to insecurity, political mobilisation and geopolitical tension.
  3. Apply the chain to one contemporary place and identify evidence that supports or challenges it.
  4. Evaluate the statement: globalisation creates nationalism rather than replacing it.

Watch: US rejects globalism and embraces patriotism at the UN

Watch: Amy Chua: revenge of the tribes

Watch: Charlottesville: race and terror

Original Weebly media still to recoverOne original nationalism video is no longer available from YouTube (NjmbCeTYQcc).
06

Geopolitical Tension: US–China Trade War and Brexit

IB SYLLABUS BULLET

Examples that illustrate geopolitical tension and conflict arising from globalisation and renewed nationalism.

The original AdornGeo page closes with two located examples. The US–China trade war shows how tariffs, strategic industries and great-power rivalry disrupt global flows. Brexit shows how sovereignty, identity, uneven development and migration reshaped the United Kingdom's relationship with the European Union.

Key teaching ideas
  • Trade conflicts use tariffs and restrictions to alter the price and direction of international flows.
  • US–China tension combines economic competition with technology, security and geopolitical influence.
  • Brexit was driven by multiple and unevenly distributed concerns, including sovereignty, identity, migration and regional economic change.
  • Both examples reveal a tension between national political control and deep economic interdependence.
Key vocabulary
tarifftrade warprotectionismdecouplingBrexiteconomic sovereignty
STUDENT TASK

Compare two tensions within globalisation

  1. Map the principal flows affected by the US–China trade war and by Brexit.
  2. Use the films to identify actors, motivations, actions and consequences at local, national and global scales.
  3. Complete a comparison table covering sovereignty, identity, economic risk and effects on supply chains.
  4. Write an HL synthesis judgement: do these examples represent deglobalisation, regionalisation or a reorganisation of globalisation?
Original AdornGeo Brexit visual
Use the original visual as a prompt to identify the economic, political and social fractures associated with Brexit.
Original AdornGeo global risks overview
Return to the original unit overview and connect the two case studies to the full risk framework.

Watch: Trade wars explained

Watch: US–China trade war: why it matters

Watch: How trade wars can spark geopolitical conflict

Watch: Brexit as a backlash against globalisation

Watch: What Brexit means for globalisation

COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY

National control in an interdependent world

Compare an international trade conflict with the withdrawal of a state from a regional political and economic bloc.

Geographical focus
  • Locate the major actors and map the most affected flows.
  • Separate economic causes from political and identity-based causes.
  • Identify consequences for individuals, businesses, states and global institutions.
  • Judge whether national action successfully restores sovereignty when economies remain interconnected.